This NPR piece has perhaps the best ever clip from a kid's show.
http://216.35.221.77/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15636600
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Cents and Sensibilities
A New York Times article about the work of Gregory Clark describes an enthralling new theory for how the seeds for the industrial revolution were planted. A part of that theory is that in the West from 1200 to 1800 the more affluent you were, the more surviving children you were likely to have. The remainder of the theory, which is a bit harder to research and will provide much opportunity for debate, is that the downward mobility that this created (at least relative downward mobility--either Clark or the article's author Wade has overlooked some Malthus) pushed upper class sensibilities into the the middle class. These sensibilities were "nonviolence, literacy, long working hours, and a willingness to save."
Two days ago, NPR ran a piece about children being the new status symbol. With the skyrocketing cost of housing, feeding, and educating children the rich are able to afford more children than poor. One commentator says that this runs counter to the last 100 years of history. Though the NPR piece turns toward the snarky, as parents (read "moms", apparently the dads are disembodied ATMs) "hire consultants to potty train their children." But this temporal juxtaposition of Clark's work and a recognition that children are being born proportionally more to rich parents is fascinating and leads me to ask: what sensibilities will be exported from the rich to the poor over this upcoming period of downward mobility?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/science/07indu.html?ei=5087%0A&em=&en=b687b5b6f4a28423&ex=1186632000&pagewanted=print
http://podcastdownload.npr.org/anon.npr-podcasts/podcast/1090/12520633/npr_12520633.mp3
Two days ago, NPR ran a piece about children being the new status symbol. With the skyrocketing cost of housing, feeding, and educating children the rich are able to afford more children than poor. One commentator says that this runs counter to the last 100 years of history. Though the NPR piece turns toward the snarky, as parents (read "moms", apparently the dads are disembodied ATMs) "hire consultants to potty train their children." But this temporal juxtaposition of Clark's work and a recognition that children are being born proportionally more to rich parents is fascinating and leads me to ask: what sensibilities will be exported from the rich to the poor over this upcoming period of downward mobility?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/science/07indu.html?ei=5087%0A&em=&en=b687b5b6f4a28423&ex=1186632000&pagewanted=print
http://podcastdownload.npr.org/anon.npr-podcasts/podcast/1090/12520633/npr_12520633.mp3
Monday, July 16, 2007
I like that music
This morning as I drove my daughter to school we were listening to Net at Nite. One of the hosts is from Canada (and this was an oldish show recorded on Canada Day) so they played (the sound from) a public service commercial from Canadian TV in the 80s. It's much better without the video, by the way. Maddie and I were singing and dancing along. After it was over my daughter looked at me and said, "Daddy, I like that music."
I was a little teary because it made me think of my wife--how she chose me when that was a big risk. My daughter asked me, "Daddy, what's wrong?"
"Nothing, honey. That song just remindedme of how much I love Momma," I said.
"No! You love me!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPDi9DzihrE
I was a little teary because it made me think of my wife--how she chose me when that was a big risk. My daughter asked me, "Daddy, what's wrong?"
"Nothing, honey. That song just remindedme of how much I love Momma," I said.
"No! You love me!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPDi9DzihrE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)